An Argument Of The Lack Of Lawyer?s Morals :: essays research papers

Synthesis PaperI clearly remember one wild and crazy Saturday night, I had just turned 19 years old and was out celebrating with my buddies. On my way home I decided to act like if I was on an episode of COPS and was arrested for drunk driving, wise driving, evading police, resisting arrest, and underage drinking. When I went to court for my first hearing I was facing a minimum of one year in jail, five thousand dollars in fines, and a two year suspension of my drivers license. Right then I knew then that I had to find myself a lawyer and was not going to pay for a worthless public defender. As I was walking out of the courtroom a lawyer approached me and asked if I needed a lawyer. Before I could answer he said he could quarter my case dismissed and each(prenominal) of my charges dropped for three thousand dollars. He didnt even know all the details of my case and already knew he could win my case. The lawyer didnt c atomic number 18 whether I was guilty or innocent he just val ued the money for taking my case. This goes to show that some lawyers dont care who is innocent or guilty as long as they can get paid a good sum of money for your court case. I will show you that some lawyers arent interested about who is innocent or guilty all they want is the chance to profit from the case. I have included three cases in this essay where lawyers dont care whether their clients are innocent or at fault.The first case I will be discussing is Liebeck Vs McDonalds. In this case an 81 year old woman (Stella Liebeck) victimization the drive through window at a local McDonalds ordered a cup of coffee. While in her vehicle Liebeck spilled the coffee on her lap and groin area and received second and third degree burns from it. With a lawyer on her side she filed a lawsuit stating that McDonalds coffee was served too hot and it was a dangerous temperature. McDonalds would not settle out of court because they believed they had proof of negligence on the victim, and would wi n the case. afterwards a long and timely lawsuit, McDonalds lost the case and the jury awarded Liebeck 2.9 million dollars. We all know that Liebeck was at fault for spilling coffee on herself, tho to the lawyer it doesnt matter.